Lewisham Council (201912664)
This complaint is about the managing agent’s response to the resident’s request that his Thames Water, Watersure Plus, discount be backdated to 2015.
All our decisions are published here as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020 and are published three months after the final decision date. In some cases we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
This complaint is about the managing agent’s response to the resident’s request that his Thames Water, Watersure Plus, discount be backdated to 2015.
The resident has complained about the following issues: That service charges for maintaining and operating a door entry system are too high. That the landlord cannot, or should not, recharge her for the full cost of this item.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of a leak at the resident’s property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the residents’ reports that a neighbour installed a gate that restricted access to the communal path serving their property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s decision to withhold a Responsible Tenant Award
The resident has complained about the time taken to investigate and resolve their reports of inadequate water pressure in their home.
The complaint is about: The managing agent’s response to the resident’s reports of defects in the property including issues with the property’s heating system and Heat Interface Units. The managing agent’s response to the resident’s reports of a defect to the windows in the property.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of mould in her property.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s refusal to consider the resident’s complaint raised on 27 May 2020 regarding the conduct of a member of staff who handled his previous complaint. The landlord’s rejection of the resident’s 21 July 2020 complaint on the basis that it was vexatious.
This complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s concerns about the repair of a bedroom ceiling that contained asbestos.