All our decisions are published here as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020 and are published three months after the final decision date. In some cases we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s response to repair reports to the: Kitchen and cooker hood. Doorbell. The landlord’s handling of reports of staff conduct. The Ombudsman has also considered the landlord’s handling of the complaint.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of missing doors in his property.
The complaint concerns: The length of time scaffolding was erected outside the property. The associated formal complaint into the matter.
The complaint is about how the landlord handled reports of antisocial behaviour (ASB) from the resident.
The complaint is about the landlord’s: Response to the resident’s reports of anti-social behaviour (ASB) in the car park area of the property. Response to the resident’s reports of problems with the ground maintenance service provided in return for the service charge. Complaints handling.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of: A pest infestation following the death of her upstairs neighbour. The resident’s upstairs neighbour having pets in their property, violating the tenancy agreement. The resident’s upstairs neighbour damaging the resident’s lights in their garden.
The complaint is about information provided to the resident regarding parking restrictions in the local area.
The complaint is about:
The complaint is about: The landlord’s handling of the resident’s concerns about the condition of the property when he moved in. The landlord’s handling of outstanding repairs. The landlord’s complaints handling.
The complaint concerns how the landlord had handled the resident’s request to be permanently rehoused.