All our decisions are published here as part of our commitment to being open and transparent. The decisions are anonymised so residents’ names are not used, but landlords are named. The decisions date from December 2020 and are published three months after the final decision date. In some cases we may decide not to publish a decision if it is not in the resident’s or landlord’s interest or the resident’s anonymity may be compromised. You can read more in our guidance on decisions.
The landlord’s handling of the resident’s reports they were missold their property due to the increase and level of service charges they are liable to pay. The landlord’s response to the resident’s reports that the landlord had violated the section 106 agreement for the property. The landlord’s response to the resident’s concerns that the landlord should not be able to charge an administration fee.
The complaint is about: The landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of no heating and hot water in the property. The landlord’s associated complaint handling.
The complaint is about the landlord’s handling of soundproofing to the resident’s home.
The complaint concerns the Council’s Environmental Health Department’s response to the complainant’s request for noise monitoring equipment and the outcome of its investigation of their noise reports.
The complaint is about how the landlord handled the resident’s request to assign his tenancy. The Ombudsman has also investigated the landlord’s complaint handling in relation to the above matter.
This complaint is about the landlord’s response to ongoing mould and damp issues at the property.
The complaint concerns the level of service charges.
The complaint is about the landlord’s response to the resident’s reports of an unknown smell in her home.
The complaint concerns the landlord’s request that a partition wall is reinstated.
The complaint concerns the contact details provided on Council Tax information.